§

Ethel M. Mitchell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.

01a44888 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 11, 2005)
Ethel M. Mitchell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,214 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 222,322 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

  3. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  4. Section 1630.13 - Prohibited medical examinations and inquiries

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.13   Cited 60 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the general rule that, except as permitted by 29 C.F.R. § 1630.14, "it is unlawful for a covered entity to require a medical examination of an employee"