Esco Elevators, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Laney Duke Storage Warehouse Co.

    369 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 59 times
    In Laney Duke, the ALJ had ordered the employer to read the notice to any employee who requested it, but the Board had expanded this to require a reading to all employees, singly or collectively, whether or not requested. The Fifth Circuit denied enforcement because it considered this remedy "unnecessarily embarrassing and humiliating to management rather than effectuating the policies of the Act."
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Esco Elevators, Inc.

    736 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times

    No. 83-4724. Summary Calendar. July 16, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Durwood D. Crawford, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Michael Dunn, Director, Region 16, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., for other interested parties. On Application for Enforcement of an Order and Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before RUBIN, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. E. GRADY

  4. Metal Blast, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 602 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 16 times

    No. 15239. November 19, 1963. Marvin S. Zelman, Cleveland, Ohio (Thomas P. Meaney, Jr., David A. Kaufman, Burke, Haber Berick, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Pollack, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Broad, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MILLER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Bowman Transportation, Inc.

    314 F.2d 497 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19552. March 1, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, P.M. Giesey, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. William M. Pate, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee. Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges and GROOMS, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The evidence in this case as presented to us is sufficient to warrant the conclusion of the Board that employee Mann was discharged for asserting a grievance