§

Eryn M. v. Dep't of the Navy

EEOC Appeal No. 0120152545 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 19, 2016)
Eryn M. v. Dep't of the Navy

5 Cited authorities

  1. Love v. Pullman Co.

    404 U.S. 522 (1972)   Cited 746 times
    Holding that a Title VII claimant need not re-file a charge after termination of state proceedings

  2. Yartzoff v. Thomas

    809 F.2d 1371 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 879 times
    Holding that a transfer of job duties can constitute an adverse employment action

  3. Carmichael v. Birmingham Saw Works

    738 F.2d 1126 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 206 times
    Holding that, where plaintiff was not given opportunity to apply for a specific job, "the defendant's subjective promotion procedures imposed upon the defendant a duty to consider for any open position all employees who might reasonably be interested in the position"

  4. Ferguson v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co.

    560 F. Supp. 1172 (D. Del. 1983)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that where secretary to business executive was temporarily transferred to secretarial pool and "[h]er salary level and other employee benefits were unchanged," no adverse job action demonstrated, but also noting that "[h]ad she been permanently reassigned . . . this element [of adversity] would be established"

  5. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,956 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"