Equitable Life Assurance Society of the U.S.

29 Cited authorities

  1. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins

    447 U.S. 74 (1980)   Cited 735 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "views expressed by members of the public" in a privately owned shopping mall "will not likely be identified with those of the owner"
  2. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

    510 U.S. 200 (1994)   Cited 425 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Holding that petitioner's constitutional claims could first be brought before the agency
  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA
  4. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
  5. West v. AT&T Co.

    311 U.S. 223 (1940)   Cited 1,628 times
    Holding that federal courts must defer to an intermediate state court's interpretation of state law, made in the very case under consideration, when the state supreme court has denied review
  6. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  7. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
  8. Lewis v. Telephone Employees Credit Union

    87 F.3d 1537 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 231 times
    Holding that remitters of cashier's checks lacked standing to sue bank for conversion because they had no rights in the instruments
  9. In re Kirkland

    915 F.2d 1236 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 186 times
    Holding that, when applying state law, this Court follows "the decision of the highest state court," or, in the absence of such a decision and any indication that the highest court would rule differently, "the decisions of the state's intermediate courts"
  10. Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Berkeley

    59 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "courts should be reluctant to vacate arbitral awards on public policy grounds"
  11. Section 602.1 - Intentional interference with lawful business or occupation open to public by obstruction or intimidation or refusal to leave premises

    Cal. Pen. Code § 602.1   Cited 81 times
    Providing that a person intentionally interferes with a lawful business carried on by the owner or agent of a business establishment open to the public "by obstructing or intimidating those attempting to carry on business, or their customers, and who refuses to leave the premises of the business establishment after being requested to leave ... by a peace officer acting at the request of the owner or the owner's agent"