§

Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

361 N.L.R.B. 892 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  3. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  4. Frenchtown Acquisition Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    683 F.3d 298 (6th Cir. 2012)   Cited 14 times
    Holding charge nurses were not supervisors despite conclusory testimony by director of nursing as to their authority to discipline

  5. Jochims v. National Labor

    480 F.3d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 05-1455. Argued January 22, 2007. Decided March 23, 2007. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Harold Craig Becker argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Daniel A. Blitz, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory

  6. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    253 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Gulf States, this court did not require the movant to prove that the putative supervisors were potentially liable for the subordinates' mistakes.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Quinn Restaurant Corp.

    14 F.3d 811 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 4 times

    No. 1870, Docket 93-4078. Argued August 13, 1993. Decided January 31, 1994. Nancy J. Gottfried, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick C. Havard, Supervising Atty., Marilyn O'Rourke, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, of counsel), for petitioner. Richard G. Kass, Mineola, N Y (Rains Pogrebin, Mineola, NY, of counsel), for respondent

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

    558 F.2d 205 (4th Cir. 1977)   Cited 13 times

    No. 76-1089. Argued September 15, 1976. Decided June 29, 1977. Andrew F. Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Robert M. Baptiste, Washington, D.C. (Gary S. Witlen, and Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., on brief), for intervenor. John O. Pollard

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second