§

English Brothers Pattern and Foundry

253 N.L.R.B. 530 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
English Brothers Pattern and Foundry

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 64 times
    In Peoples Gas, the court recognized, for the first time, the Board's obligation to provide a reasoned explanation for ordering an affirmative bargaining order: "A remedial order should recognize the competing considerations which are potentially affected by the remedy chosen, be grounded in factual determinations rather than speculation, and explain how, in light of present circumstances its remedy can be expected to effectuate the purposes of the Act."Id. at 45 (footnote omitted).

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cement Transport, Inc.

    490 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 35 times

    No. 73-1260. Argued October 17, 1973. Decided January 22, 1974. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1974. Lawrence Levien, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Alan D. Cirker, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Louis E. Woolery, Louisville, Ky., for respondent; James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN

  5. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    527 F.2d 803 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 74-1608, 74-1668. Argued September 9, 1975. Decided December 8, 1975. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 13, 1976. Ann Neydon, New York City, for petitioner in No. 74-1608 and intervenor in No. 74-1668. Arthur M. Goldberg and George Kaufman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner in No. 74-1608 and intervenor in No. 74-1668. John F. Depenbrock, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy