Engineered Control Systems, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  4. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8
  5. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
  6. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Sky Wolf Sales

    470 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 23 times
    In Sky Wolf Sales, the employer's general manager, two non-union salesmen, and a warehouse foreman had assisted in circulating a decertification proceeding.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Mount Desert Island Hosp

    695 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 12 times
    Upholding Board finding of concerted activity where, after discussing working conditions extensively with other employees, employee wrote letter to newspaper complaining of work conditions and citing complaints of fellow workers, and subsequently over one hundred employees corroborated employee's complaints and joined employee's petition to management
  9. Sahara-Tahoe Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    648 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 2 times

    No. 79-7152. Argued and Submitted June 12, 1980. Decided November 28, 1980. Linda S. Klibanow, Parker, Milliken, Clark Ohara, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Eric Moskowitz, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued for respondent; Elliot Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. On Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON, FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations