§

Energy Cooperative, Inc.

290 N.L.R.B. 635 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Energy Cooperative, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 335 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  5. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  7. Lodges 743 and 1746, Etc. v. United Aircraft

    534 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that "[w]hether to award prejudgment interest in cases arising under federal law has in the absence of a statutory directive been placed in the sound discretion of the district courts"

  8. Local Union 1395, Intern. Broth. v. N.L.R.B

    797 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 50 times
    Adopting this section of the Restatement

  9. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local No. 310 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    587 F.2d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 40 times
    Binding plaintiffs without their consent to a new CBA, determining their rights vis-à-vis their employer going forward, implicates the duty of fair representation

  10. E. L. Wiegand Division v. N.L.R.B

    650 F.2d 463 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that employer may not terminate worker's disability benefits when he publicly supports a strike because disabled employee cannot withhold employment services