§

Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.

345 N.L.R.B. 448 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Endicott Interconnect Technologies, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute

  5. Titanium Metals Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    392 F.3d 439 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 03-1345 and 03-1410. Argued October 15, 2004. Decided November 30, 2004. Rehearing En Banc Denied February 11, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. George E. Yund argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Titanium Metals Corporation. Kira D. Vol, Attorney, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen

  6. Sierra Pub. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    889 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 23 times
    Discussing N.L.R.B. v. Local Union No. 1229 (Jefferson Standard ), 346 U.S. 464, 74 S.Ct. 172, 98 L.Ed. 195, and its progeny

  7. Compuware Corporation v. National Relations

    134 F.3d 1285 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that no specific authorization was needed to show concerted activity where an employee had "almost from the beginning of his employment . . . discussed . . . problems with other employees" and made objections on behalf of other employees for their mutual aid or protection

  8. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    268 F.3d 575 (8th Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unprotected "materially false and misleading" statement that hospital was " ‘jeopardizing the health of mothers and babies’ by depleting its staff of labor and delivery [nurses], reducing the effectiveness of the remaining [nurses] by increasing their duties, and providing less qualified replacements"

  9. Community Hosp. of Roanoke Val. v. N.L.R.B

    538 F.2d 607 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 14 times
    Holding protected a television interview in which a nurse complained of hospital staff shortages, and suggested that they were related to low pay