§
Enclosure Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nash v. Florida Industrial Comm'n

    389 U.S. 235 (1967)   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding preempted an administrative policy interpreting presumably valid state unemployment insurance law exception for "labor disputes" to include proceedings under NLRB complaints

  4. United States ex rel. Moore v. General Insurance Co. of America

    396 U.S. 902 (1969)   Cited 108 times

    No. 310. November 10, 1969, OCTOBER TERM, 1969. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Artie P. Stephens for petitioners. M. R. Irion for respondent. Reported below: 406 F. 2d 442.

  5. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Wheeling Electric Company

    444 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1971)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Wheeling Electric Co., 444 F.2d 783 (4th Cir. 1971), we faced an analogous question pertaining to the status of confidential secretaries.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  8. Continental Insurance Company v. N.L.R.B

    409 F.2d 727 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 13 times
    In Continental Insurance the record established that, although labor policy was centralized, business activity was decentralized in some respects in that "each Branch Claims Office in question is a separate autonomous unit, enjoying complete control over the processing of the vast majority of claims.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. North Arkansas Elec. Coop., Inc.

    446 F.2d 602 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 19437. August 12, 1971. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Robin, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Gaines N. Houston, Little Rock, Ark., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges. ROSS, Circuit Judges. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order requireing reinstatement of Jack Lenox

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.