§

Emeryville Trucking, Inc.

278 N.L.R.B. 1112 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Emeryville Trucking, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.

    376 U.S. 473 (1964)   Cited 426 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding status of employer as independent contractor is immaterial because focus of joint employment inquiry is on employees, not employers

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  4. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  6. Royal Development Co., Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 363 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 81-7638, 81-7736. Argued and Submitted August 9, 1982. Decided February 22, 1983. Robert Katz, Jeffrey Harris, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner/cross-respondent. William R. Stewart, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Checker Cab Company

    367 F.2d 692 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times

    No. 16722. October 4, 1966. Certiorari Denied January 9, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 715. Allison Brown, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Michael R. Brown, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Louis J. Colombo, Jr., and Philip J. Neudeck, Detroit, Mich., for respondents, William J. Mullaney, Detroit, Mich., on

  8. Ref-Chem Company v. N.L.R.B

    418 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 17 times
    Finding there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion that a joint employer relationship existed in a case in which the alleged joint employer contractually had the "right to approve employees, control the number of employees, have an employee removed, inspect and approve work, pass on changes in pay and overtime allowed."

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Greyhound Corp.

    368 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying the Supreme Court's standard to hold that Greyhound and the independent contractor were joint employers

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355