§

Emery's I.G.A. Store of Florence, Inc.

219 N.L.R.B. 121 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Emery's I.G.A. Store of Florence, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to § 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  4. Corrie Corporation of Charleston v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 149 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    Finding employer's statement was not protected in light of other circumstances that made statement coercive

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 20, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Bird Machine Company for an enforcement of an order of the board. Decree enforcing order of board granted. Owsley Vose, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushein, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frances Lopinsky, all of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner

  6. E. Anthony Sons v. National Labor Rel. Board

    163 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1947)   Cited 10 times

    No. 9385. Argued March 11, 1947. Decided June 23, 1947. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 89. On Petition for Review and on Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by E. Anthony Sons, Inc., against the National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the Board wherein the Board sought a decree enforcing the Board's order. Petition to set aside order of Board denied and petition of Board granted. Mr. Elisha

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Richter's Bakery

    140 F.2d 870 (5th Cir. 1944)   Cited 6 times

    No. 10695. February 8, 1944. Rehearing Denied March 1, 1944. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Richter's Bakery. Petition granted, and decree enforcing order entered. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Helen F. Humphrey, Senior Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner