§

Emerson Electric Co.

177 N.L.R.B. 75 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Emerson Electric Co.

26 Cited authorities

  1. Thomas v. Collins

    323 U.S. 516 (1945)   Cited 886 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  4. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  5. Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.

    309 U.S. 206 (1940)   Cited 219 times
    Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

  6. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.

  7. Marshfield Steel Company v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 38 times

    No. 17315. November 20, 1963. Ransom A. Ellis, Jr., of Walker, Daniel, Clampett, Rittershouse Ellis, Springfield, Mo., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the respondent and Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Before VOGEL and MATTHES, Circuit Judges, and

  8. Betts Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    380 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1967)   Cited 32 times

    No. 8813. May 26, 1967. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, R. Austin Northern, Roscoe E. Long and Brock R. Snyder, Topeka, Kan., on brief), for petitioner. Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HICKEY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times

    No. 16996. April 7, 1967. Clarice Feldman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. David E. Burgess, Detroit, Mich., MacFarlane, Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondents. Before O'SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge. CECIL, Senior

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Soft Water Laundry, Inc.

    346 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 26 times

    No. 21303. June 15, 1965. Richard P. Lawlor, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jesse S. Hogg, Tampa, Fla., Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for respondent. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued against

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"