§

Emerson Electric Co.

176 N.L.R.B. 744 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Emerson Electric Co.

16 Cited authorities

  1. John Wiley Sons v. Livingston

    376 U.S. 543 (1964)   Cited 1,771 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

  2. Piano Musical Instrument Workers, v. W. W. Kimball

    379 U.S. 357 (1964)   Cited 21 times
    In W.W. Kimball Co., the Seventh Circuit found that a dispute over seniority rights under an expired collective-bargaining agreement was nonarbitrable.

  3. U.S. Gypsum Co. v. United Steelworkers of Amer

    384 F.2d 38 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 30 times
    Rejecting broad claim that "[u]nion, subsequent to its decertification, ha[d] no right to enforce the [relevant collective bargaining] agreement or any of its provisions" and permitting decertified union to assert grievances for relief that "arose under the contract and for breach of which effective relief was available prior to decertification"

  4. United Steelworkers of Amer. v. Reliance Univ

    335 F.2d 891 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 34 times
    In Reliance Universal and Wackenhut, supra, one entity purchased the business of another and continued the previous operation without significant change, employing substantially all of the seller's organized personnel.

  5. Wackenhut v. Int'l U., United Plant Guard W

    332 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 33 times
    In Wackenhut the purchaser acquired substantially all the assets of the seller and assumed substantially all the seller's liabilities, although it did not expressly assume the seller's labor agreement.

  6. Overnite Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    372 F.2d 765 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times

    Nos. 10570, 10617. Argued November 4, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Ernest W. Machen, Jr., and Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for petitioner Overnite Transp. Co. Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C., (Michael F. Grdina, Willoughby, Ohio, on brief), for petitioner Teamsters Local Union No. 171. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.

    276 F.2d 303 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 36 times

    No. 17965. March 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1960. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., John W. Wilcox, Jr. (of Wilson, Branch Barwick), Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in National Labor Relations

  8. McGuire v. Humble Oil Refining Company

    355 F.2d 352 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times
    In McGuire, as in Wiley, employees sought arbitration against a successor employer; this court found compelling against arbitration the considerations that possible preferential awards to those employees might cause "unrest and dissatisfaction" among other employees, and that such arbitration might constitute the unfair labor practice of bargaining with a group other than the certified bargaining representative.

  9. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.

    330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.