§

Elmira Machine and Specialty Works, Inc.

148 N.L.R.B. 1695 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Elmira Machine and Specialty Works, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Local 833, Uaw-Afl-Cio, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    300 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 40 times

    Nos. 15961, 16031, 16182. Argued September 11, 1961. Decided January 26, 1962. Certiorari Denied June 4, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1258. Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Mr. Louis H. Pollak, New Haven, Conn., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. John Silard, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Local 833, UAW-AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, petitioner

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thayer Co.

    213 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 40 times
    In Thayer, the court first announced that if the activity causing dismissal was protected under § 7 of the Act then denial of reinstatement was unlawful. If the activity was unprotected under § 7, however, the legality of the denial was to be determined according to a balancing test.

  3. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 814, a complete tentative agreement was reached; this was revised and then signed by the company's president but retained, until after the certification year expired, by its labor consultant, with a misrepresentation on his part to the union that the agreement had not been signed.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.

    209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. I. Posner, Inc.

    304 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 332, Docket 27342. Submitted April 23, 1962. Decided July 3, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Leo N. McGuire, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Leight, Drimmer Weinstein, New York City, and Murray A. Frank, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Burton H. Zuckerman, New York City, of counsel), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Maintenance Corporation

    283 F.2d 569 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 40, Docket 26255. Argued October 4, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Elliott Moore, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Friedlander Gaines, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, Norbert Ruttenberg, Edward Cherney, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before HINCKS, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN