§
Ellis Electric

14 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Shelby Memorial Hosp. Ass'n

    1 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Ordering employees to remove union patches based on uniform policy not previously enforced violated § 158

  3. N.L.R.B. v. O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service

    924 F.2d 692 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 18 times
    Finding company's "right to fine or reprimand the drivers for failure to comply with company procedures" as support for concluding limousine drivers were employees

  4. United Dairy Farmers Co-op. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    633 F.2d 1054 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 79-1807, 79-1883. Argued May 23, 1980. Decided October 30, 1980. John Regis Valaw, James J. Flaherty (argued), Pittsburgh, Pa., Stephen J. Cabot, Pechner, Dorfman, Wolffe, Rounick Cabot, Philadelphia, Pa., for United Dairy Farmers Cooperative Association. Hugh J. Beins, Jonathan G. Axelrod (argued), Bethesda, Md., Louis B. Kushner, Rothman, Gordon, Foreman, Groudine, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for Teamsters Local Union No. 205. Richard B. Bader (argued), Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Ritchie Manufacturing Company

    354 F.2d 90 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times

    No. 17978. December 14, 1965. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1966. Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, on the brief, for petitioner. Rex J. Ryden, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown; Iowa, H.G. Cartwright, of Cartwright, Druker, Ryden Fagg, Marshalltown, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY

  6. Property Resources Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    863 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 8 times
    Stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. NLRB , 362 F.2d 466, 470 (9th Cir. 1966) )

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  8. Shelly & Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    In Shelly Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974), we identified the four elements essential to protected status of concerted activity.

  9. International U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B

    455 F.2d 1357 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times
    Upholding Board's finding § 8 violation when photographing union activity "continued long after it became apparent that there would be no violence on the picket line"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc.

    325 F.2d 360 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 29 times

    No. 15180. December 11, 1963. William J. Avrutis, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, on the brief), for petitioner. George N. Bashara, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for respondents. Before WEICK and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and DARR, Senior District Judge. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Elias Brothers Big Boy, Inc., referred to herein as "Elias," sells and distributes in the Detroit area several restaurant