Ella Roberts, Complainant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

8 Cited authorities

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,406 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  2. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 19,997 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"
  3. Ray v. Henderson

    217 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,279 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for purposes of a Title VII retaliation claim, "an action is cognizable as an adverse employment action if it is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity"
  4. Richardson v. New York State Dept. of Corr

    180 F.3d 426 (2d Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,232 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding one month between service of deposition notices in plaintiff's Title VII lawsuit and the employer's abusive acts sufficient to establish a causal link between the lawsuit and the adverse actions
  5. Drake v. Minn. Mining Mfg. Co.

    134 F.3d 878 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 622 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a white employee may sue under Title VII for discrimination against him resulting from his friendship with black co-workers
  6. Henson v. City of Dundee

    682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 977 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a supervisor makes sexual overtures to employees of both genders, or where the conduct is equally offensive to male and female workers, the conduct may be actionable under state law, but it is not actionable as harassment under Title VII because men and women are accorded like treatment
  7. Gunnell v. Utah Valley State Coll.

    152 F.3d 1253 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 522 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a retaliatory discharge claim must be predicated on intentional and knowing retaliation
  8. Appendix to Part 1630 - Interpretive Guidance on Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act

    29 C.F.R. § 1630 app to Part 1630   Cited 860 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity entails the nature and severity of the impairment; the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and the permanent or long term impact