Electronic Reproduction Service Corp.

23 Cited authorities

Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,643 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.
415 U.S. 36 (1974) Cited 2,891 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,909 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,235 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge
403 U.S. 274 (1971) Cited 831 times
Holding wrongful discharge action brought in state court precluded by pervasiveness of federal regulation in the area
Boys Markets v. Clerks Union
398 U.S. 235 (1970) Cited 859 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements
Smith v. Evening News Assn
371 U.S. 195 (1962) Cited 816 times
Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union
Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.
375 U.S. 261 (1964) Cited 367 times
Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA
H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
397 U.S. 99 (1970) Cited 222 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 332 (1944) Cited 457 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
Section 173 - Functions of Service
29 U.S.C. § 173 Cited 380 times
Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."

Electronic Reproduction Service Corp.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

Holding wrongful discharge action brought in state court precluded by pervasiveness of federal regulation in the area

Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements

Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union

Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

Providing that the "final adjustment by a method agreed upon by the parties is declared to be the desirable method for settlement of grievance disputes. . . ."