§

Electronic Products International Corp.

208 N.L.R.B. 350 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Electronic Products International Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Royal Plating Polishing Co.

    350 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 43 times
    In NLRB v. Royal Plating Polishing Co., Inc., 350 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1965), the court characterized a company's decision to close a plant when "faced with the economic necessity of either moving or consolidating the operations of a failing business" as a "management decision which [is] fundamental to the basic direction of a corporate enterprise" and which lies "at the core of entrepreneurial control.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Drapery Manufacturing Co.

    425 F.2d 1026 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 19 times
    Distinguishing Fibreboard and Ozark Trailers, the court holds that the decision of a parent company to close its subsidiary involved a major shift in investment capital, hence the decision to close not a mandatory bargaining subject under Fibreboard

  5. Morrison Cafeterias Consol., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    431 F.2d 254 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 12 times

    No. 17832. August 19, 1970. Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Eli Nash, Jr., Atty., on the brief. Andrew P. Carter, of Monroe Lemann, New Orleans, for petitioners; C. King Mallory, New Orleans, La., on the briefs. Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon the petitioners'