Electrical Workers IUE Local 444 (Paramax Systems)

51 Cited authorities

Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,217 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,079 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Teamsters v. Terry
494 U.S. 558 (1990) Cited 874 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that, while plaintiffs' "claim include[d] both legal and equitable issues," their demand for a legal remedy meant they were entitled to a jury trial
Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.
332 U.S. 194 (1947) Cited 4,217 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that if the agency rests its decision on "grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action by substituting what it considers to be a more adequate or proper basis"
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
431 U.S. 209 (1977) Cited 869 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding that compelling nonmember employees to contribute to union's political activities infringes employees' First Amendment rights
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.
416 U.S. 267 (1974) Cited 761 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
Humphrey v. Moore
375 U.S. 335 (1964) Cited 760 times
Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others
Ellis v. Railway Clerks
466 U.S. 435 (1984) Cited 388 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that union conventions, social activities, and publications were chargeable so long as they did not relate to political causes
Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
493 U.S. 67 (1989) Cited 302 times
Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 882 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,340 times 88 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,106 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
Section 152 - General duties
45 U.S.C. § 152 Cited 1,261 times 1 Legal Analyses
Imposing the duty not only to "maintain" agreements but also to "make" them

Electrical Workers IUE Local 444 (Paramax Systems)

51 Cited authorities

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that, while plaintiffs' "claim include[d] both legal and equitable issues," their demand for a legal remedy meant they were entitled to a jury trial

Holding that if the agency rests its decision on "grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action by substituting what it considers to be a more adequate or proper basis"

Holding that compelling nonmember employees to contribute to union's political activities infringes employees' First Amendment rights

Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

Holding that union conventions, social activities, and publications were chargeable so long as they did not relate to political causes

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Imposing the duty not only to "maintain" agreements but also to "make" them