Electrical Workers Ibew Local 532 (Brink Construction)

14 Cited authorities

Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
461 U.S. 731 (1983) Cited 978 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills
353 U.S. 448 (1957) Cited 2,323 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts
Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
368 U.S. 502 (1962) Cited 575 times
Holding that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over § 301 claims
Labor Board v. Insurance Agents
361 U.S. 477 (1960) Cited 324 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"
Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Todd
461 U.S. 260 (1983) Cited 132 times
Holding that "[n]othing in the legislative history of § 8(f) indicates Congress intended employers to obtain free the benefits of stable labor costs, labor peace, and the use of the union hiring hall. Having had the music, he must pay the piper."
Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
454 U.S. 404 (1982) Cited 116 times
Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"
Intern. Broth. of Elec. Wkrs., 532 v. Brink
825 F.2d 207 (9th Cir. 1987) Cited 26 times
Holding that after an employer revoked its letter of assent with its collective bargaining representative, the representative could no longer, at that point, commit the employer into subsequently-negotiated agreements
N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.
618 F.2d 288 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 25 times 1 Legal Analyses
No. 79-1120. June 2, 1980. Rehearing Granted July 15, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, John S. Irving, John E. Higgins, Jr., Robert E. Allen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Manitzas, Harris Padgett, J. Joe Harris, San Antonio, Tex., for respondent. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for other interested party. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TUTTLE, GOLDBERG
Danielson v. Int'l Or. of Mast., M. P
521 F.2d 747 (2d Cir. 1975) Cited 29 times
Discussing standards for § 10( l) injunction
Rayner v. N.L.R.B
665 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 12 times
In Rayner, the Board found the employer in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) and entered a remedial make-whole order that lasted beyond the end of the labor agreement.

Electrical Workers Ibew Local 532 (Brink Construction)

14 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

Holding that § 301 expresses a federal policy in favor of the enforceability of labor contracts

Holding that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over § 301 claims

Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

Holding that "[n]othing in the legislative history of § 8(f) indicates Congress intended employers to obtain free the benefits of stable labor costs, labor peace, and the use of the union hiring hall. Having had the music, he must pay the piper."

Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

Holding that after an employer revoked its letter of assent with its collective bargaining representative, the representative could no longer, at that point, commit the employer into subsequently-negotiated agreements

Discussing standards for § 10( l) injunction

In Rayner, the Board found the employer in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) and entered a remedial make-whole order that lasted beyond the end of the labor agreement.