§

Electrical Workers Ibew Local 211 (Atlantic Division Neca)

280 N.L.R.B. 85 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Electrical Workers Ibew Local 211 (Atlantic Division Neca)

7 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  3. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  4. Local Union No. 948, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    697 F.2d 113 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that it is unlawful coercion for an exclusive hiring hall to deny access to members of local unions other than the local operating the hiring hall

  5. Intern. U. of Oper. Eng. Local 406 v. N.L.R.B

    701 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 16 times
    In Operating Engineers, we held that the union violated section 8(b)(1)(A) when it changed its hiring hall procedures to permit members to take six-day jobs without forfeiting list seniority by not informing a member who declined a six-day job in reliance on the prior five-day rule.

  6. Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 v. N.L.R.B

    712 F.2d 225 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 15 times

    No. 80-1757. Argued February 4, 1982. Decided July 8, 1983. Harold G. Korbee (argued), Wood, Lamping, Slutz Reckman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Paul Bateman (argued), Emil Farkas, Director Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge. The Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor, United States District Court

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease