§

Electrical Workers Ibew Local 113 (Collier Electric)

296 N.L.R.B. 1095 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Electrical Workers Ibew Local 113 (Collier Electric)

27 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,535 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

  2. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,630 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  3. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,905 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 984 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  5. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,231 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

  6. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Bakery Workers

    430 U.S. 243 (1977)   Cited 535 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration clause survived the expiration of the CBA, even though the agreement was silent as to survival

  7. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit

  8. Smith v. Evening News Assn

    371 U.S. 195 (1962)   Cited 816 times
    Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union

  9. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 314 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  10. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  11. Section 301 to 309 - Repealed

    29 U.S.C. § 301 - 29 U.S.C. § 309   Cited 240 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In 29 U.S.C. § 301 (a) the Congress stated its finding that pension plans have become "an important factor in commerce", and that it is in the interest of the "free flow of commerce" that disclosure of the terms of such plans be made.