Electric Motors and Specialties, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
  2. Smith v. Evening News Assn

    371 U.S. 195 (1962)   Cited 815 times
    Holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union
  3. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA
  4. Ramsey v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003, 84 S.Ct. 1938, 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964), the Seventh Circuit declared that "[t]here is no statutory or constitutional right to be present at an arbitration hearing," rejecting the employee's contention that his rights were denied since he was not given notice of the arbitration hearing and did not appear there. The court specifically noted that the facts showed "that the company fully and adequately defended [the employee's] rights at the hearing."
  5. Pacemaker Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    260 F.2d 880 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12344. November 13, 1958. Larry S. Davidow, Davidow Davidow, Detroit, Mich., Al. J. Spahn, Elkhart, Ind., for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and HASTINGS and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Chief Judge

  6. Pedersen v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    234 F.2d 417 (2d Cir. 1956)   Cited 15 times

    No. 273, Docket 23888. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 7, 1956. Emanuel Friedman, New York City (Sidney S. Grant, Grant Angoff, Boston, Mass., of counsel on the brief), for petitioner. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Myron P. Gordon, New York City, for intervenor. Before FRANK, LUMBARD and WATERMAN

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. English Mica Co.

    195 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6393. Argued April 8, 1952. Decided April 23, 1952. Elizabeth W. Weston, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Takoma Park, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Erle Phillips, Atlanta, Ga. (I. Walter Fisher, Atlanta, Ga., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chautauqua Hardware

    208 F.2d 750 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 1 times

    No. 83, Docket 22805. Argued November 12, 1953. Decided December 18, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Robert E. Miller, Attorneys, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., Bond, Schoeneck King, Lyle W. Hornbeck, Syracuse, for respondent. Before SWAN, FRANK and MEDINA, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Circuit Judge. This case lies within very narrow compass. Decision must turn