§

Electric Motors and Specialties, Inc.

149 N.L.R.B. 1432 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Electric Motors and Specialties, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Solo Cup Company

    237 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 40 times

    No. 15524. October 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1956. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Hasburgh, Kansas City, Mo. (Carl E. Enggas and Watson S. Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before WOODROUGH

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Signal Oil and Gas Company

    303 F.2d 785 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    In NLRB v. Signal Oil Gas Co., 303 F.2d 785 (5th Cir. 1962), this Circuit has discussed at length the obligation of the employer where there are competing unions and "the situation [has] not crystallized," not to exert influence thereby tipping the scales and "depriving the employees of their right to select their representative in a free contest between the rival organizations."

  6. International Un., Prog., Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    319 F.2d 428 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 13 times
    Ordering Board to determine employee choice of representative at time of enforcement proceeding because of significant turnover and great lapse of time

  7. International Ladies' G.W.U. v. N.L.R.B

    237 F.2d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 12511, 12585. Argued February 3, 1956. Decided May 3, 1956. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in case No. 12511. Mr. Samuel H. Jaffee, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 12511. Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, for respondent in case No. 12511, and petitioner in case No. 12585. Mr. Robert G. Johnson, Attorney, National Labor Relations

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Furniture Co.

    199 F.2d 648 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14201. November 12, 1952. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington D.C., for petitioner. Hoke Smith and Welborn Cody, Atlanta, Ga., Herbert B. Kimzey, Cornelia, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. After proceedings before a trial examiner, the petitioner issued its order against the respondent on March 17