§

Elder-Beerman Stores Corp.

173 N.L.R.B. 566 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees

  6. Daniel Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 805 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 36 times
    In Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), this court considered the identical question presented here. The Board, having found that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) during the course of an election campaign and that such conduct had interfered with the employees' free choice, set the election aside, and ordered that a new election be held. The company sought review of both matters in this court.

  7. Signal Oil and Gas Company v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 338 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that a non-union employee engaged in protected concerted activity

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Blades Manufacturing Corporation

    344 F.2d 998 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 25 times
    In Blades the court nullified a second election (choosing the union) within a year of a valid election rejecting the union.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Neuhoff Bros., Packers, Inc.

    375 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    No. 23330. March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet A. Kohn, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Karen W. Ferguson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Fritz L. Lyne, Erich F. Klein, Jr., Lyne, Klein French, Dallas, Tex., for appellee. Before BROWN, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of its Order holding that the Employer violated

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Yale Manufacturing Company

    356 F.2d 69 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times

    No. 6572. Heard January 3, 1966. Decided February 1, 1966. Bernard M. Dworski, Washington, D.C., Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. McENTEE, Circuit Judge. In this proceeding the National Labor