§

E.L.C. Electric, Inc.

344 N.L.R.B. 1200 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
E.L.C. Electric, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience

  6. Kamtech, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.3d 800 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 01-1391, 01-1558. Submitted: August 7, 2002. Decided and Filed: September 4, 2002. This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on September 4, 2002. On December 3, 2002, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Daughtrey, Circuit Judge. J. Roy Weathersby, Eric K. Smith (briefed), Littler Mendelson, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner Cross-Respondent. Ailen A. Armstrong, Dep.Asso.Gen.Counsel, National

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  8. McGraw-Edison Company v. N.L.R.B

    419 F.2d 67 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 33 times

    No. 19429. December 4, 1969. Paul S. Kuelthau, of Moller, Talent Kuelthau, St. Louis, for petitioner and filed brief and reply brief. John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Robertamarie Kiley, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief with Mr. Burgoyne. Charles A. Werner, St. Louis, Mo., for intervenor; Gibson Langsdale, Kansas

  9. Uniroyal Technology Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    151 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 2 times
    Noting that union activist's “glowing performance reviews” and willingness to fill in on overtime shifts factored into the analysis of whether union activity was a motivating factor in discharge

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Warren L. Rose Castings, Inc.

    587 F.2d 1005 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 15 times

    No. 77-3597. December 12, 1978. Elliott Moore, Joseph P. Norelli, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A. Patrick Nagel, Irvine, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and HUG, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District Judge. Hon. Warren J. Ferguson, United States District Judge, for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. HUG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board applies for enforcement of its

  11. Section 142 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 142   Cited 355 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining a strike as “any strike or other concerted stoppage of work by employees”

  12. Section 103.20 - Election procedures and blocking charges

    29 C.F.R. § 103.20   Cited 6 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that a party who files an unfair labor practice charge simultaneously file a “written offer of proof in support of that charge”