§

Elbert V. Brooks, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

01971681 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 9, 1999)
Elbert V. Brooks, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Sanchez v. Standard Brands, Inc.

    431 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 1,412 times
    Holding scope of complaint "limited to the 'scope' of the EEOC investigation which can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination."

  2. Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology

    545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in balancing the scope of reasonable opposition conduct, "[t]he requirements of the job and the tolerable limits of conduct in a particular setting must be explored"

  3. DeCintio v. Westchester County Medical

    807 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 150 times
    Holding that an employer did not engage in sex discrimination by appointing his female “paramour” rather than qualified male applicants

  4. Miller v. Aluminum Co. of America

    679 F. Supp. 495 (W.D. Pa. 1988)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that preferential treatment based on a supervisor's affair with subordinate is not gender- based discrimination

  5. Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation, Etc.

    425 F. Supp. 318 (D. Mass. 1976)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that discharge six months after EEOC settlement and a month after an informal complaint satisfies causation requirement