§

Elayne Bartner, Complainant, v. Bill Richardson, Secretary, Department of Energy, Agency.

01a03445 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 10, 2000)
Elayne Bartner, Complainant, v. Bill Richardson, Secretary, Department of Energy, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters v. United States

    431 U.S. 324 (1977)   Cited 4,611 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff who did not apply for a position can still make prima facie showing if he can demonstrate his application for the position would have been futile

  2. Davoll v. Webb

    194 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 332 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court properly applied a disparate impact framework in a pattern-or-practice case

  3. Loulseged v. Akzo Nobel Inc.

    178 F.3d 731 (5th Cir. 1999)   Cited 207 times
    Holding that district court properly granted judgment as a matter of law to defendant-employer, where plaintiff quit rather than giving employer an opportunity to continue with the interactive process

  4. Malarkey v. Texaco, Inc.

    983 F.2d 1204 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 221 times
    Holding that statements or stray remarks made by non-decisionmakers were properly received when "they showed the pervasive corporate hostility towards [plaintiff] and supported her claim that she did not receive a promotion due to her employer's retaliatory animus"