Eichorn Motors, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
  3. Assurance Co. v. Building Association

    183 U.S. 308 (1902)   Cited 202 times
    Noting the general rule that "a condition contained in the [insurance] policy cannot be waived by an agent, unless he has express authority so to do"
  4. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    301 F.3d 167 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding unlawful polling when employees were solicited to appear in an anti-union film
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Cook County School Bus, Inc.

    283 F.3d 888 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Differentiating the doctrine of equitable reformation and the "clear and convincing" standard of the doctrine of mistake with regular interpretation of a contract
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.

    159 F.3d 946 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    In Wehr we observed: "As Fibreboard and First National Maintenance make clear, a decision to subcontract is not necessarily subject to mandatory collective bargaining; whether such bargaining is mandatory can only be answered by looking to the particular facts presented in the individual case."
  7. Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. N. L. R. B

    165 F.3d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that uncontested coercive interrogation of replacement employees did not taint the employees' signatures on the decertification petition
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Orland Park Motor Cars

    309 F.3d 452 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1 times

    No. 01-2894. Argued April 16, 2002. Decided October 29, 2002. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Coffey, Circuit Judge. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Region 13, Chicago, IL, Aileen Armstrong, Usha Dheenan (Argued), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Robert E. Bloch (Argued), Dowd, Bloch Bennett, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor. James F. Hendricks (Argued), Fisher Phillips, Chicago, IL, for Respondent. Before CUDAHY, COFFEY

  9. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    680 F.2d 974 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1758. Argued February 3, 1982. Decided June 4, 1982. McNeill Smith, Greensboro, N.C., J. Hamilton Stewart, III, Greenville, N.C. (Martin N. Erwin, Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell and Hunter and Donald A. Cockrill, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, Greenville, N.C., on brief), for petitioner. Richard A. Cohen, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel