E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Hudson v. Michigan

    547 U.S. 586 (2006)   Cited 1,483 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that violation of “knock-and-announce” rule under Fourth Amendment did not require suppression of evidence where deterrence benefits would be outweighed by substantial social costs
  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 730 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  4. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
  5. Brewers and Maltsters v. N.L.R.B

    303 F. App'x 899 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

    No. 07-1423. December 8, 2008. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Stacey A. Aschemann, Arthur J. Martin, Schuchat, Cook Werner, St Louis, MO, for Petitioner. Ruth E. Burdick, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, J. Englehart, Attorney, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Ronald E. Meisburg, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Robert A. Fisher, Arthur G. Telegen, Foley Hoag, Boston, MA, for Intervenor. Before:

  6. Communication Workers of America v. N.L.R.B

    784 F.2d 847 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 85-1924, 85-2225. Argued February 10, 1986. Decided March 3, 1986. Lincoln V. Janus, Illinois Bell Telephone, Co. Legal Dept., Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Judith Dowd, N.L.R.B., James Coppess, AFL-CIO, Legal Dept., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAUER, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 157, requires employers that seek to conduct

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co.

    674 F.2d 618 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times

    No. 80-2629. Argued September 28, 1981. Decided March 17, 1982. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1982. Paul J. Spielberg, Elliott Moore-N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Stephen S. Schulson, Ill. Bell Telephone, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BAUER, Circuit Judge, FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Wesley E. Brown, Senior District Judge of the District of Kansas, is sitting by designation. WESLEY

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Potter Electric Signal Co.

    600 F.2d 120 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 9 times

    No. 78-1763. Submitted April 17, 1979. Decided May 21, 1979. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 9, 1979. Sara McLaurin Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Kenneth B. Hipp, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner, N.L.R.B. Davis Biggs, Jr. of Biggs, Casserly, Barnes, Fickie

  9. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    664 F.2d 1095 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 6 times

    No. 81-1248. Submitted October 15, 1981. Decided November 30, 1981. Leonard Singer, Kansas City, Mo., argued, for Montgomery Ward Co.; Watson, Ess, Marshall Enggas, Kansas City, Mo., of counsel. Paul J. Speilberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, argued, Morton Namrow, Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the

  10. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,058 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB