All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
Edward P. Lantz, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
01a51828_r (E.E.O.C. Jan. 26, 2006)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
0
Citing Briefs
Briefs
0
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
0
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
3
Edward P. Lantz, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
3
Cited authorities
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden
503 U.S. 318 (1992)
Cited 1,473 times
44 Legal Analyses
Holding that where the statute does not helpfully define the term "employee," courts should apply its established meaning
Spirides v. Reinhardt
613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
Cited 271 times
Holding "no one factor is determinative" of whether individual is employee or independent contractor for purposes of Title VII
Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government
42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16
Cited 4,948 times
20 Legal Analyses
Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"