Economic Security Corp. Of Southwest Area

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard
  2. Chase Manhattan Bk. v. Vishipco Line

    459 U.S. 976 (1982)   Cited 113 times

    No. 81-1591. November 1, 1982, October TERM, 1982. C.A. 2d Cir. Motions of New York Clearing House Association and Federal Reserve Bank of New York for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE and JUSTICE POWELL would grant certiorari. Reported below: 660 F. 2d 854.

  3. Decca Ltd. v. U.S.

    454 U.S. 819 (1981)   Cited 88 times
    Applying federal choice of law rules
  4. Labor Board v. Atkins Co.

    331 U.S. 398 (1947)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that employer-employee relationship is determined by power to set wages and hours, coupled with the financial burden of the wages and receipt of the benefits of the work, as well as the absolute power to hire and fire or the power to control all the activities of the worker
  5. Powell v. Tucson Air Museum Foundation

    771 F.2d 1309 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 25 times

    No. 84-2137. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1985. Decided September 18, 1985. William C. Mach, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. Max C. Richards, Jackson G. Gallup, Max C. Richards, P.C., Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before POOLE and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and McGOVERN, District Judge. The Honorable Walter T. McGovern, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, sitting

  6. Skills Dev. Servs., Inc. v. Donovan

    728 F.2d 294 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 19 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that nonprofit corporations that contracted with the State of Tennessee to provide services to the mentally disabled were not state instrumentalities for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act even though the contracts could be terminated at any time
  7. Truman Medical Ctr., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    641 F.2d 570 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that a hospital was not exempt from NLRB jurisdiction because the majority of its board of directors was neither appointed nor subject to removal by public officials or the general public
  8. Jefferson County Community Center v. N.L.R.B

    732 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that an entity was not exempt as a political subdivision under section 152"although seven directors are appointed by public agencies" because "a majority of the Board is neither appointed by nor subject to removal by public officials or the general electorate and has no official connection to any governmental body"
  9. Crestline Memorial Hosp. Ass'n, v. N.L.R.B

    668 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 16 times
    In Crestline Memorial Hospital Association v. NLRB, 668 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1982), the hospital claimed exemption from the NLRA under the political subdivision exception.
  10. Williams v. Eastside Mental Health Center

    669 F.2d 671 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 15 times
    Concluding that a heavily regulated CMHC was not a political subdivision of a state because state licensing regulations "are normal means by which states effectuate public policies through the regulation of private entities ... [but] do not ... somehow magically transform the fundamental nature of the licensed entity into a public agency or official"
  11. Section 9901 - Purposes and goals

    42 U.S.C. § 9901   Cited 34 times
    Defining community action agency as a "State or political subdivision of a State . . . or a combination of such political subdivisions. . . ."