§

Ebenezer Rail Car Services

333 N.L.R.B. 167 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Ebenezer Rail Car Services

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Almet, Inc.

    987 F.2d 445 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that threatening to discipline employees for not reporting union solicitation violated § 8

  6. Standard Products, Rocky Mnt. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    824 F.2d 291 (4th Cir. 1987)   Cited 4 times
    Finding no Section 8 violation in the termination of an employee who "[i]n the short space of his employment . . . had been repeatedly warned about his tardiness and unexcused absences"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. North Carolina Coastal Motor Lines

    542 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 76-1135, 76-1401. Argued August 25, 1976. Decided September 29, 1976. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner in No. 76-1135 and for respondent in No. 76-1401. Robert A. Valois, Raleigh, N.C. (Frank P. Ward, Jr., Maupin, Taylor Ellis, Raleigh, N.C., on brief), for respondent in No. 76-1135 and for petitioner