§

Ebasco Services Inc.

107 N.L.R.B. 617 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
Ebasco Services Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    190 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 52 times

    No. 21395. Argued June 14, 1951. Decided July 13, 1951. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and FRANK and L. HAND, Circuit Judges. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for the respondent. L. HAND, Circuit Judge. By a divided vote we decided this appeal last year upon the same record that is now before us, holding that the Board's order should be "enforced." The Supreme Court vacated our order and remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in two

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gaynor News Co.

    197 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 45 times
    In Gaynor it was conceded that the sole criterion for extra payments was union membership, and the vacation payments were admittedly gratuitous.

  5. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.

  6. Stewart v. Baltimore O.R. Co.

    137 F.2d 527 (2d Cir. 1943)   Cited 32 times
    In Stewart, for example, counsel confronted the witness with an affidavit which the witness and counsel could read at the time its correctness was affirmed in court.

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. F.H. McGraw Co.

    206 F.2d 635 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 11778. June 4, 1953. Petitions for Modification and Rehearing Denied July 7, 1953. Joseph Lotterman, New York City, for respondents. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Dean E. Denlinger, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Wheeler Marshall, Paducah, Ky., and Lotterman Tepper, New York City, on brief; James G. Wheeler, Paducah, Ky., Ralph R. Weiser, New York City, of counsel, for

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Childs Co.

    195 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 11 times

    No. 60, Docket 22102. Argued March 5, 1952. Decided April 4, 1952. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Marvin E. Frankel, all of Washington, D.C., Marvin E. Frankel, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for petitioner National Labor Relations Board. Garey Garey, New York City, William Helfer, New York City, of counsel, for respondent Childs Co. Boudin, Cohn Glickstein, New York City, Vera Boudin and

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jarka Corp., Phila

    198 F.2d 618 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 10 times

    No. 10715. Argued June 18, 1952. Filed August 15, 1952. Rehearing Denied October 8, 1952. Elizabeth W. Weston, Washington, D.C., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Louis H. Wilderman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent Union. Robert G. Kelly, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief,

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Arthur G. McKee

    196 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13876. May 10, 1952. Louis Libbin, Attorney, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., and D.P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Paul Y. Cunningham, Brownsville, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Upon findings: that respondent in constructing the Carthage Hydrocol plant in Brownsville, Texas, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National