§

Eaton Yale & Towne Inc.

171 N.L.R.B. 600 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Eaton Yale & Towne Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,647 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,910 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

  3. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,235 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

  4. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”

  7. Ramsey v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003, 84 S.Ct. 1938, 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964), the Seventh Circuit declared that "[t]here is no statutory or constitutional right to be present at an arbitration hearing," rejecting the employee's contention that his rights were denied since he was not given notice of the arbitration hearing and did not appear there. The court specifically noted that the facts showed "that the company fully and adequately defended [the employee's] rights at the hearing."

  8. East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was

  9. Acme Industrial Co. v. N.L.R.B

    351 F.2d 258 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 3 times

    No. 15045. October 6, 1965. E. Allen Kovar, Charles J. Griffin, Jr., Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, CASTLE and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court upon the petition of Acme Industrial Company to review and set aside, and upon