§

Eastern Washington Distributing Co., Inc.

216 N.L.R.B. 1149 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
Eastern Washington Distributing Co., Inc.

23 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  3. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  4. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  5. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  6. Moglia v. Geoghegan

    394 U.S. 919 (1969)   Cited 76 times

    No. 1007. March 24, 1969. ORDER C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Isidore Englander for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen for respondents. Reported below: 403 F. 2d 110.

  7. Moglia v. Geoghegan

    403 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 120 times
    Holding that Section 302 was violated where "[a]ppellant conceded ... that at no time relevant ... there was a collective bargaining agreement or any written agreement" between the employer and the union

  8. Terrell Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 1088 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times

    No. 13371. Argued December 2, 1969. Decided January 20, 1970. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C. (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas E. Silfen, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and HARVEY, District Judge. WINTER, Circuit Judge:

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Frick Company

    423 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 42 times
    In Frick itself, we upheld the Board policy of applying an irrebuttable presumption of continued majority status for a "reasonable period of time" to voluntarily recognized unions, and applying a rebuttable presumption thereafter. 423 F.2d at 1332.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company

    362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 43 times

    No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the