§

East Side Shopper, Inc.

204 N.L.R.B. 841 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
East Side Shopper, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 507 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  4. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Varo, Inc.

    425 F.2d 293 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times
    High-ranking officer, in his office and with secretary present and taking notes, questioned employees

  6. Montgomery Ward Co. v. N.L.R.B

    377 F.2d 452 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16961. May 9, 1967. Narcisse A. Brown, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Roy W. Short, Cincinnati, Ohio, Richard C. Scheidt, William F. McNally, Christoper J. Michas, Chicago, Ill., on the brief. Davis, Farley, Short Roberts, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel. George B. Driesen, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Allen M. Hutter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

    368 F.2d 975 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 15 times
    In Monroe, the surveillance, held not a § 8(a)(1) violation, occurred on working time in the plant rather than on non-working time as in the present case.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Tommy's Spanish Foods, Inc.

    463 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Tommy's Spanish Foods, Inc., 463 F.2d 116 (9th Cir. 1972), the employer met with the employees to inform them "[we] would never agree to any union demand to which `we were opposed as a matter of principle.'"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Preston Feed Corporation

    309 F.2d 346 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 12 times

    No. 8555. Argued May 30, 1962. Decided October 5, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Devaney, Washington, D.C. (Charles V. Wehner, Kingwood, W. Va., and Steptoe Johnson, Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys