§

Early California Industries Inc.

195 N.L.R.B. 671 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Early California Industries Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.

    358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966)   Cited 26 times
    In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.

  6. Mead and Mount Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B

    411 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 21 times

    No. 19234. June 5, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 14, 1969. William B. Craig of Craig, Woodruff Hanley, Omaha, Neb., for petitioner. Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., were with him on brief. Before BLACKMUN, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This is the first of three appeals from the National

  7. Texas Aluminum Company v. N.L.R.B

    435 F.2d 917 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times

    No. 29434 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. December 16, 1970. George E. Seay, Durwood D. Crawford, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner; Seay, Gwinn Crawford, Dallas, Tex., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Elmer P. Davis, Director, Region 16, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison

  8. Henry I. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    417 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry I. Siegel, we held that we will examine the context of statements and the atmosphere in which they were made to determine whether they constitute "a permissible forceful argument in opposition to the union or a veiled threat to the employees in the event the union should win the election."

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kropp Forge Co.

    178 F.2d 822 (7th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kropp Forge Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 822, and in N.L.R.B. v. La Salle Steel Co., 7 Cir., 178 F.2d 829, our examination and consideration of the entire record in each of those cases convinced us that there was a general pattern and plan of anti-union hostility justifying the Board in finding that the particular words and acts complained of were coercive.

  10. P.R. Mallory Co. v. N.L.R.B

    422 F.2d 757 (7th Cir. 1970)

    No. 17554. January 23, 1970. As Modified on Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 3, 1970. Frederic D. Anderson, Charles E. Bruess, Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer Boyd, Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Angelo v. Arcadipane, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge, and KILEY and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges