§

E. V. Prentice Machine Works, Inc.

120 N.L.R.B. 417 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
E. V. Prentice Machine Works, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  2. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Trimfit of Calif

    211 F.2d 206 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Affirming an NLRB order requiring reinstatement of pro-Union former employees

  6. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941)   Cited 33 times

    Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerset Shoe Co.

    111 F.2d 681 (1st Cir. 1940)   Cited 33 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Somerset Shoe Co., 1 Cir., 111 F.2d 681, decided May 9, 1940, the provision was approved without discussion and, apparently, without consideration.

  8. Mannerfrid v. United States

    200 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 15 times

    No. 45, Docket 22434. Argued November 6, 1952. Decided December 8, 1952. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Edward L. Dubroff, Brooklyn, N Y, of counsel, for appellant. John M. Foley, New York City, Myles J. Lane, U.S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, New York City, Louis Steinberg, District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, New York City, Ralph Farb, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, New

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ohio Calcium Co.

    133 F.2d 721 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 21 times

    No. 9217. February 19, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Ohio Calcium Company. Decree in accordance with opinion. Fannie M. Boyls, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Ruth Weyand, and Fannie M. Boyls, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, of Ashland, Ky. (Robert T. Caldwell and Porter M

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Inter-City Adv. Co.

    190 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1951)   Cited 12 times

    No. 6226. Argued June 11, 1951. Decided July 16, 1951. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel; David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel; A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondents. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER