§

E. S. Merriman & Sons

219 N.L.R.B. 972 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
E. S. Merriman & Sons

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Falk v. Brennan

    414 U.S. 190 (1973)   Cited 406 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a company exercising “substantial control of the terms and conditions of the work” of the employees is an employer under the FLSA

  3. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  4. Peerless of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Peerless, we stated that the Board's decision to issue such an order must be accompanied by "`specific findings' as to the immediate and residual impact of unfair labor practices on the election process... and `a detailed analysis' assessing the possibility of holding a fair election... and the potential effectiveness of ordinary remedies."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Gibson Prod. Co. of Washington Par

    494 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Gibson Products Co., 494 F.2d 762, 766-68 (5th Cir. 1974), the court explained further the specificity requirement, mandating findings such as the express inability of less drastic remedies to "purify" electoral conditions.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Ship Shape Maintenance Co.

    474 F.2d 434 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 20 times

    No. 71-1849. Argued May 22, 1972. Decided December 1, 1972. Mr. Jonathan G. Axelrod, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Michael E. Jaffe, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Messrs. Allen G. Siegel and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for respondent. Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and McGOWAN and MacKINNON, Circuit Judges. MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Gruber's Super Market, Inc.

    501 F.2d 697 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v Gruber's Super Market (501 F.2d 697) the employer called a meeting of employees three days before election and (1) asked each why he wanted a union, and (2) told the employees that if the union did not win, the employees would get a raise.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Chair Company

    361 F.2d 283 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 24 times

    No. 10000. Argued November 4, 1965. Decided May 6, 1966. Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. R.D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Josey Hardy, Greensboro, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and MICHIE, District Judge. MICHIE, District Judge. This case comes before

  9. Clark's Gamble Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    422 F.2d 845 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 18354. March 4, 1970. Shawe Rosenthal, Earle K. Shawe, Robert S. Hillman, Baltimore, Md., on brief of petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assts. Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief for respondent. Plone, Tomar, Parks Seliger, by Howard S. Simonoff, Camden, N.J., of counsel, S.G. Lippman, Gen. Counsel Retail Clerks International Assn., AFL-CIO, on brief for intervenor. Before WEICK, Chief Judge

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Henry Colder Company

    447 F.2d 629 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 7 times

    No. 18678. August 17, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerome Weinstein, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Russ R. Mueller, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge and KILEY and PELL, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. In an earlier appeal in this proceeding, NLRB v. Henry Colder Co., 416 F.2d 750 (7th Cir. 1969), this court enforced

  11. Section 2 - Collection, collation, and reports of labor statistics

    29 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 67 times   2 Legal Analyses

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics, under the direction of the Secretary of Labor, shall collect, collate, and report at least once each year, or oftener if necessary, full and complete statistics of the conditions of labor and the products and distribution of the products of the same, and to this end said Secretary shall have power to employ any or either of the bureaus provided for his department and to rearrange such statistical work, and to distribute or consolidate the same as may be deemed desirable