E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.

10 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.
434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 30 times
No. 28576. November 2, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, La., David E. Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Spring, Md., for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, William F. Banta, Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges
Wirtz v. B.A.C. Steel Products, Inc.
312 F.2d 14 (4th Cir. 1962) Cited 29 times
In B.A.C., the Secretary supplied the exact information here requested by defendant, and if plaintiff will just do what Secretary Wirtz did voluntarily in B.A.C., defendant will have the information it wants.
N.L.R.B. v. McCann Steel Company
448 F.2d 277 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 13 times
In McCann Steel, the employer reduced its yearly Christmas bonus after employees voted to join the union, while in Electric Steam Radiator, the employer revoked a similar fringe benefit following a successful union representation election.
N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill
308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 22 times
No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §
Dura Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 5 times
In Dura Corp. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967), participation in the Company's Profit-Sharing Plan for Executive and Salaried Personnel was restricted to employees who were not in a bargaining unit recognized by the Company.
Bendix-Westinghouse Auto. Air B. v. N.L.R.B
443 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1971)
No. 20754. May 25, 1971. Thomas J. Quigley, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Squire, Sanders Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, C.F. Donnelly, B.G. Andrews, C.E. Wasmuth, Jr., Southfield, Mich., on brief. Herbert Fishgold, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas E. Silfen, Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before McCREE, BROOKS, and MILLER, Circuit
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 times
No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.

10 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

In B.A.C., the Secretary supplied the exact information here requested by defendant, and if plaintiff will just do what Secretary Wirtz did voluntarily in B.A.C., defendant will have the information it wants.

In McCann Steel, the employer reduced its yearly Christmas bonus after employees voted to join the union, while in Electric Steam Radiator, the employer revoked a similar fringe benefit following a successful union representation election.

In Dura Corp. v. NLRB, 380 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1967), participation in the Company's Profit-Sharing Plan for Executive and Salaried Personnel was restricted to employees who were not in a bargaining unit recognized by the Company.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"