§
E. H. Blum

8 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Inland Empire Council v. Millis

    325 U.S. 697 (1945)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Inland Empire, a union that had lost a representation election brought suit in district court challenging the Board's proceedings on the ground that there had not been the "appropriate hearing" mandated by Section 9(c) of the NLRA. It argued that the failure to provide such a hearing violated the union's statutory and due process rights.

  3. Foreman Clark, Inc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    215 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 30 times

    No. 13894. July 30, 1954. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Balthis, George R. Richter, Jr., Roy Littlejohn, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie Boyls, Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HEALY, BONE and LEMMON, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. "The flattery of hope and the impressions of fear", referred to by common-law writers in connection with confessions, can intrude

  4. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Botany Worsted Mills

    133 F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 8132, 8133. Argued November 18, 1942. Decided January 18, 1943. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce the Board's order against the Botany Worsted Mills, and petition by the Botany Worsted Mills to set aside the Board's order. The Botany Worsted Mills moved to consolidate the petitions and for leave to adduce additional evidence. Petition of Board granted with modification in accordance with opinion, and petition of the respondent

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Trinity Steel Co.

    214 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times

    No. 14764. June 23, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott, General Counsel, Alan R. Waterstone, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Carl B. Callaway, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. BORAH, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by National Labor Relations Board, filed pursuant to section

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.

    203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Huntsville Mfg. Co., 203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953), this court articulated a standard of "reasonableness which courts may exact of the board in the exercise of the discretion accorded it in determining `whether or not the election should be set aside for irregularities in procedure.'"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Texas Utilities

    214 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times
    In NLRB v. West Texas Utilities Co., 214 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1954), there was substantial evidence, presented in a number of affidavits, that Board agents had engaged in improper conduct affecting the election results.

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. S.H. Kress Co.

    194 F.2d 444 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 11266. February 21, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, General Counsel, NLRB., Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Samuel M. Singer, and Robert G. Johnson, all of Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Martin I. Rose, New York City, N.Y., Martin I. Rose, New York City, on brief; Martin I. Rose, New York City, John J. Larkin, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for respondent. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. HICKS