§

E & A Protective Services - Bravo, LLC

26-CA-091325 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 22, 2013)
E & A Protective Services - Bravo, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 96 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  3. Evans v. Stephens

    387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 15 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding President did not exceed constitutional authority in making recess judicial appointment

  4. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"

  5. United States v. Woodley

    751 F.2d 1008 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 14 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that recess appointments clause applies to all vacancies that exist when the Senate is in recess and noting that the courts and the executive branch have consistently adhered to this view

  6. United States v. Allocco

    305 F.2d 704 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 25 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding the President may make appointments to all vacancies that exist during a Senate recess