§

DYNAMICS INC.

IPR2020-00499 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 5, 2020)
DYNAMICS INC.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc.

    811 F.3d 435 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 63 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Upholding findings regarding motivation to combine based on expert testimony

  2. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc.

    849 F.3d 1034 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 45 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board incorporated the Examiner's findings by reference because it particularly identified the Right of Appeal Notice and the specific page ranges where the incorporated material could be found

  3. Elbit Sys. of Am., LLC v. Thales Visionix, Inc.

    881 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2018)   Cited 40 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Patent Trial and Appeal Board's determination that "expert's testimony was 'unsupported' and entitled to 'little weight' because he did not address or account for" a limitation in his opinion

  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 403 times   188 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 375 times   630 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A