Dynamics Corp. Of America
5 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Savair Manufacturing Co.
414 U.S. 270 (1973) Cited 123 times 1 Legal AnalysesNoting that although an employee may not be "legally bound to vote for the union and has not promised to do so in any formal sense" some "would feel obliged " to cast a union vote after having signed a union recognition slip
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 timesUpholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
666 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1982) Cited 5 timesNo. 81-4177. Summary Calendar. January 22, 1982. Fulbright Jaworski, T. J. Wray, Houston, Tex., for Central Freight Lines, Inc. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, POLITZ and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: This labor dispute grew out of an organizational campaign launched by the International Association
Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 804 Cited 4,048 times 32 Legal AnalysesRecognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant