Duvernoy & Sons, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  3. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  4. Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    142 F.2d 371 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 24 times

    No. 12740. May 1, 1944. Petition to Review Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Elastic Stop Nut Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board based on the board's findings and conclusion that the petitioner was engaging in unfair labor practices in violation of the National Labor Relations Act, wherein the board prayed for enforcement of its order. Enforcement ordered as prayed by the Board. Charles E. Whittaker, of Kansas City, Mo. (Henry