§
Durkheimer v. Comm'r

3 Cited authorities

  1. Stanley v. Stanley

    142 A. 851 (Conn. 1928)   Cited 17 times

    In paragraph three-five of her will, the testatrix bequeathed to the "widow and children" of her deceased brother one third of her furniture and household effects and, in paragraph sixteen, divided the residue of her estate into two equal parts, giving one of them outright to a son of her brother, and the other in trust with direction to pay one quarter of the net income for life to each of two of her brother's daughters and to distribute the balance equally among all the "children of my deceased

  2. Meyerovitz v. Jacobovitz

    160 N.E. 331 (Mass. 1928)   Cited 9 times
    Rejecting a claim that a will had been revoked when, despite some indication of a purpose to revoke, “the agreement contained no reference to the will and was not signed and attested as required for a will”

  3. Brown v. Hilleary

    32 P.2d 584 (Or. 1934)   Cited 3 times

    Argued April 24, 1934 Affirmed May 15, 1934 Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County, EARL C. LATOURETTE, Judge. T.J. Cleeton, of Portland, for appellant. Warren E. Thomas, of Portland, and A.G. Beattie, of Oregon City (Schuebel Beattie, of Oregon City, and Chamberlain, Thomas Kraemer, of Portland, on the brief), for respondents John W. Hilleary, Nathan O. Love and Leatha Love, E.W. Hornshuh, and A.H. Zanders. Suit by Pearl Brown against John W. Hilleary and others. From an adverse decree, plaintiff