§
Dura Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  2. Local 542, Int'l Un. of Oper. E. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times

    No. 14286. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided March 13, 1964. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Wilfred F. Lorry, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Leo Maguire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, Baltimore,

  3. Welch Scientific Company v. N.L.R.B

    340 F.2d 199 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 24 times
    In Welch Scientific Co. v. NLRB, 340 F.2d 199 (2 Cir. 1965), neither the Trial Examiner's report nor the Board's decision referred to the three-fold criteria, and the Board's brief in this court sought to justify the order as to interrogation only on the basis of lack of any proper purpose.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Machinists

    279 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 13 times

    No. 16564. June 4, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 11, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Alfred Avins, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Plato E. Papps, Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before CHAMBERS and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge. MATHES, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Appleton Electric Company

    296 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Disagreeing over Board's authority to disregard accretion clauses

  6. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15038, 15079. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided May 19, 1960. Mr. Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15038. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  7. Harris Langenberg Hat v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    216 F.2d 146 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15053. October 18, 1954. David F. Crossen, St. Louis, Mo. (Biggs, Curtis, Biggs Crossen, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Elizabeth Head, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and COLLET

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Mine Workers

    198 F.2d 389 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6409. Argued June 18, 1952. Decided July 18, 1952. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 17, 1952. See 73 S.Ct. 183. John E. Jay, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Fannie M. Boyls, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Louis D. Meisel, Fairmont, W. Va., for respondents. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER

  9. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  10. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"