§

Duquesne University of the Holy Ghost

198 N.L.R.B. 891 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Duquesne University of the Holy Ghost

9 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Koehler

    328 F.2d 770 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 21 times

    No. 14285. February 24, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Gary Green, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John D. Raikos, Richard P. Tinkham, Jr., Indianapolis, Ind., James K. Sommer, Indianapolis, Ind., Briggs, Berner, Sommer Tinkham, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit

  4. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 31 times
    In Chicago Rawhide, this Court concluded that: "[n]either mere cooperation, preference, nor possibility of control constitute unfair labor practices; and the Board may not infer conduct that is violative of the Act from conduct that is not, unless there is a substantial basis, in fact or reason, for that inference."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. H H Plastics Manufacturing Co.

    389 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. H H Plastics Mfg. Co., 389 F.2d 678, 681 (6th Cir. 1968), a case in which a majority of employees signed cards acknowledging a union as their representative, we intimated that the more relevant dates concerning an alleged company-dominated union and validity of an election were the beginning of the organizational campaign and the election itself.

  6. Coppus Engineering Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    240 F.2d 564 (1st Cir. 1957)   Cited 25 times
    In Coppus we adopted the requirement of actual evidence of domination of Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955), and found none. Chief Judge Magruder, in a concurring opinion, recognized fully that the Shop Committee may have been "a feeble instrument", 240 F.2d at 573, but that it was "not the duty of the employer nor a function of the Board to `baby' along the employees in the direction of choosing an outside union."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Dennison Manufacturing Company

    419 F.2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1970)   Cited 7 times

    No. 7304. December 10, 1969. Rehearing Denied January 12, 1970. Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 1264. Baruch A. Fellner, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on brief, for petitioner. Louis Chandler, Boston, Mass., with whom Alan S. Miller and Stoneman Chandler, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Dennison Mfg

  8. Huberta Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.2d 793 (6th Cir. 1969)

    No. 18415. April 1, 1969. John P. Cinque, Jr., Bellaire, Ohio, for petitioners; Cinque, Banker Linch, Bellaire, Ohio, on brief. Burton L. Raimi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael N. Sohn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before O'SULLIVAN, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. ORDER This Cause is before us upon petition of Huberta Coal Company, Inc. and

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Holland Mfg. Co.

    292 F.2d 840 (3d Cir. 1961)

    No. 13519. Argued June 6, 1961. Decided July 31, 1961. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board